Official Feedback Issue 105

Want to air your opinions on the latest issue of Retro Gamer? Step inside...

Moderators: mknott, NickThorpe, lcarlson, Darran@Retro Gamer, MMohammed

AmigaJay
Posts: 1433
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 5:58 pm

Re: Official Feedback Issue 105

Post by AmigaJay » Sat Jul 21, 2012 1:40 pm

ncf1 wrote:
Apple IIGS - GS standing for Graphics and Sound. Built for gaming pleasure. Simply cannot go wrong.
Well for $1000 the graphics weren't any better than the Amiga and ST, with many games getting direct C64 ports, on one of the main GS sites it lists most of the games ever written for the GS (not inc Apple 2) and there is only 151 - far from the thousands on said other machines, though one good feature of the GS was the amazing sound chip though...but it's a machine hardly remembered for gaming...

User avatar
ncf1
Posts: 1255
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2010 2:04 am
Location: Australia

Re: Official Feedback Issue 105

Post by ncf1 » Sat Jul 21, 2012 2:49 pm

AmigaJay wrote:
ncf1 wrote:
Apple IIGS - GS standing for Graphics and Sound. Built for gaming pleasure. Simply cannot go wrong.
Well for $1000 the graphics weren't any better than the Amiga and ST, with many games getting direct C64 ports, on one of the main GS sites it lists most of the games ever written for the GS (not inc Apple 2) and there is only 151 - far from the thousands on said other machines, though one good feature of the GS was the amazing sound chip though...but it's a machine hardly remembered for gaming...
I remember it for gaming, and its amazing sound chip.

NorthWay
Posts: 1602
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 11:02 am
Location: Grimstad, Norway

Re: Official Feedback Issue 105

Post by NorthWay » Sat Jul 21, 2012 3:04 pm

Just had a quick flip through the magazine, but

ST: Did you say DotC came out later on the Amiga and was a port? The Amiga was the target machine and came before any other versions...

User avatar
gman72
Posts: 8018
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 9:41 pm
Location: UK. Norfolk

Re: Official Feedback Issue 105

Post by gman72 » Sat Jul 21, 2012 4:54 pm

NorthWay wrote:Just had a quick flip through the magazine, but

ST: Did you say DotC came out later on the Amiga and was a port? The Amiga was the target machine and came before any other versions...
Yeah, I already told him. He got that fact very wrong but no-ones perfect, right? :D
“To gain your own voice, you have to forget about having it heard.” —Allen Ginsberg, WD

NorthWay
Posts: 1602
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 11:02 am
Location: Grimstad, Norway

Re: Official Feedback Issue 105

Post by NorthWay » Sat Jul 21, 2012 6:39 pm

gman72 wrote:Yeah, I already told him. He got that fact very wrong but no-ones perfect, right? :D
"My name is Nobody, and Nobody's Perfect"

How is the DotC 2 game in comparison btw? I have the CD but have never tried it on anything.

NorthWay
Posts: 1602
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 11:02 am
Location: Grimstad, Norway

Re: Official Feedback Issue 105

Post by NorthWay » Sat Jul 21, 2012 6:41 pm

Oooh! And did we have an argument over if Gauntlet should have been on the 10-ST-exclusives list?

User avatar
The Laird
Posts: 8496
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2009 11:01 am
Location: Luton
Contact:

Re: Official Feedback Issue 105

Post by The Laird » Sat Jul 21, 2012 9:05 pm

NorthWay wrote:Just had a quick flip through the magazine, but

ST: Did you say DotC came out later on the Amiga and was a port? The Amiga was the target machine and came before any other versions...
Yes it was a mistake, the ST site I was using as a source had the wrong information.
NorthWay wrote:Oooh! And did we have an argument over if Gauntlet should have been on the 10-ST-exclusives list?
Please tell me how a conversion of an arcade game that appeared on multiple platforms can be considered an exclusive :wink:

NorthWay
Posts: 1602
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 11:02 am
Location: Grimstad, Norway

Re: Official Feedback Issue 105

Post by NorthWay » Sun Jul 22, 2012 12:07 am

Jagfest_UK wrote:Please tell me how a conversion of an arcade game that appeared on multiple platforms can be considered an exclusive :wink:
No Amiga version.

Ok, so that is not good enough for the literal qualification, but everybody praised the version so much that it felt like it was a totally different product from the C= 64/ZX/CPC/A8/whatnot ports.

(Yes, I know there is an Amiga version now, but I wouldn't have held that against you :-)

User avatar
Darran@Retro Gamer
Posts: 6759
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 11:34 am
Location: Bournemouth
Contact:

Re: Official Feedback Issue 105

Post by Darran@Retro Gamer » Sun Jul 22, 2012 10:45 am

Actually I like the idea of a list of Atari ST exclusives that never appeared on the Amiga (and vice versa maybe).
Image

User avatar
gman72
Posts: 8018
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 9:41 pm
Location: UK. Norfolk

Re: Official Feedback Issue 105

Post by gman72 » Sun Jul 22, 2012 10:47 am

Darran@Retro Gamer wrote:Actually I like the idea of a list of Atari ST exclusives that never appeared on the Amiga (and vice versa maybe).
Enduro Racer - ST only
Super Sprint - ST only
These two really stick out because they were brilliant on the ST...
Supersprint even catered for an extra player using keys making for some great multi-player, and the ST Enduro racer was even better than the mighty Spectrum version. :)
“To gain your own voice, you have to forget about having it heard.” —Allen Ginsberg, WD

User avatar
gman72
Posts: 8018
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 9:41 pm
Location: UK. Norfolk

Re: Official Feedback Issue 105

Post by gman72 » Sun Jul 22, 2012 10:54 am

Jagfest_UK wrote:
NorthWay wrote:Just had a quick flip through the magazine, but

ST: Did you say DotC came out later on the Amiga and was a port? The Amiga was the target machine and came before any other versions...
Yes it was a mistake, the ST site I was using as a source had the wrong information.
The old adage rings true: Always double check your research. :D
“To gain your own voice, you have to forget about having it heard.” —Allen Ginsberg, WD

User avatar
HalcyonDaze00
Posts: 4621
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 6:20 pm

Re: Official Feedback Issue 105

Post by HalcyonDaze00 » Sun Jul 22, 2012 10:58 am

The old adage rings true: Always double check your research
yeah, its a poor excuse for shoddy work

User avatar
DreamcastRIP
Posts: 9376
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 10:40 am
Location: England

Re: Official Feedback Issue 105

Post by DreamcastRIP » Sun Jul 22, 2012 11:05 am

HalcyonDaze00 wrote:... Horrific cover, one of the worst ever, the covers seem to be going from bad to worse at the moment.

... The ST piece is a bit dull but so was the ST so thats about right I think.

... And it's nice to see the mag give VF5 the credit it deserves, the Virtua Fighter games have long wiped the floor with Tekken and Streetfighter!
HalcyonDaze00 wrote:
Issues 103, WTF!!!!!! had the making of Double Dragon....one of the biggest most important games of all time and they slap a picture of an Atari 2600 on the cover
yeah, one of the worst decisions they have made. Some very strange choices over the last few months.
HalcyonDaze00 wrote:
but the 'Amiga beaters' was just silly (Outrun, really, when there are so much better racers on the Amiga?)
the Amiga beaters was cringeworthy, dreadful stuff.
HalcyonDaze00 wrote:
I didn't want an Atari -- it's crap! I did buy an Atari, plugged it in once and thought it was just too slow and dated.
Can't argue with him on that to be fair
HalcyonDaze00 wrote:
The old adage rings true: Always double check your research
yeah, its a poor excuse for shoddy work
TROLLOLOLOLOLOL! :roll:
Own: Jaguar JaguarCD Lynx 7800 Dreamcast Saturn MegaDrive MegaCD 32X Nomad GameGear PS3 PS PSP WiiU Wii GameCube N64 DS GBm GBA GBC GBP GB Virtual Boy Xbox Vectrex PCE Duo-R 3DO CDi CD32 GX4000 WonderSwan NGPC Gizmondo ColecoVision iPhone PC Mac

User avatar
The Beans
Posts: 3635
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 12:18 pm

Re: Official Feedback Issue 105

Post by The Beans » Sun Jul 22, 2012 11:20 am

DreamcastRIP wrote:TROLLOLOLOLOLOL! :roll:
Surely it's your post that's the actual troll post here? A post that selectively quotes somebody else to paint them in a bad light and is specifically designed to derail the thread. Classic trolling. How come you're never banned for this crap? You're the worst on the forum for it.
If it's slower than me, dumber than me and it tastes good ... tough titty.

User avatar
DreamcastRIP
Posts: 9376
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 10:40 am
Location: England

Re: Official Feedback Issue 105

Post by DreamcastRIP » Sun Jul 22, 2012 11:43 am

The Beans wrote:
DreamcastRIP wrote:TROLLOLOLOLOLOL! :roll:
Surely it's your post that's the actual troll post here? A post that selectively quotes somebody else to paint them in a bad light and is specifically designed to derail the thread. Classic trolling. How come you're never banned for this crap? You're the worst on the forum for it.
Surely it's your post that's the actual troll post here? You oh-so-conveniently omit to mention only one of those quoted posts was selectively quoted in a pitiful attempt to bolster your own paper thin argument in a way solely designed to fan the flames and derail the thread. Classic trolling. How come you're never banned for this crap? When it comes to self-righteous, opinion stated as fact, smug holier than thou crap preaching at others like you're mightier than the rest of us you're the worst on the forum for it. Classic keyboard warrior behaviour from one with an axe to grind as part of your personal crusade against me ever since you were chastened by all and sundry in the original GameGadget thread. Get over yourself, already.
Own: Jaguar JaguarCD Lynx 7800 Dreamcast Saturn MegaDrive MegaCD 32X Nomad GameGear PS3 PS PSP WiiU Wii GameCube N64 DS GBm GBA GBC GBP GB Virtual Boy Xbox Vectrex PCE Duo-R 3DO CDi CD32 GX4000 WonderSwan NGPC Gizmondo ColecoVision iPhone PC Mac

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests