Picture related

Moderators: mknott, NickThorpe, lcarlson, Darran@Retro Gamer, MMohammed
Of course, they have to adapt to a changing situation based on new information/cases etc. If the rules didn't change we'd still be fulled locked down as in March. People are gonig to moan because they love a good moan.
The situation is the same as when we started only now people that have been following these guidelines are getting fed up of them changing
Agreed, that and the conspiracy crap... grow up.psj3809 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 28, 2020 8:34 amHate it when people make it political. Whatever party is in charge they would have struggled, people have complained when things have been too strict, then you hear people moaning when they werent strict enough and if they had brought in lockdown earlier lots of lives would have been saved
Which would be fine IF the politicians in charge of England were actually following the science.RetroBob wrote: ↑Fri Nov 27, 2020 10:31 amNo the situation is not the same at all: scientists and doctors/nurses know a lot more than we did in March and know how to better treat patients than they did; we are now going in to winter instead of out of it; we have mass testing available... I could go on.
We all know that typing "Amen" and sharing that post on facebook helps cure such things.merman wrote: ↑Sat Nov 28, 2020 11:52 amJust take church services as an example.
First lockdown: no church services
Relaxed restrictions: churches socially distanced
Tiers: no services in Tier 3, limited numbers in other tiers
Lockdown 2: no church services
New Tiers: churches open in all tiers socially distanced
Can I report this post because it's all political? It's against the AUP.................................................................... I mean, c'mon, I could now reply with you being a biased labour supporting anti-Tory Northerner trying to push his political beliefs on normal people.merman wrote: ↑Sat Nov 28, 2020 11:52 amWhich would be fine IF the politicians in charge of England were actually following the science.RetroBob wrote: ↑Fri Nov 27, 2020 10:31 amNo the situation is not the same at all: scientists and doctors/nurses know a lot more than we did in March and know how to better treat patients than they did; we are now going in to winter instead of out of it; we have mass testing available... I could go on.
They clearly aren’t, else we never would have paid people to eat out in August leading to a 17% increase in cases.
Just take church services as an example.
First lockdown: no church services
Relaxed restrictions: churches socially distanced
Tiers: no services in Tier 3, limited numbers in other tiers
Lockdown 2: no church services
New Tiers: churches open in all tiers socially distanced
That’s not based on any evidence, that’s tinkering.
And psj, of course it’s political.
The party in charge held a pandemic exercise in 2017 and failed to implement the recommendations, that means it cost an extra £10 billion to refill PPE stocks in April compared to 2019 prices. The party in charge implemented 10 years of NHS and public sector cuts, leaving hospitals and councils unable to cope (and severely hamstrung by small budgets). And the party in charge handed out key contracts to incompetent private firms like Serco that have failed repeatedly costI got more than they should. Oh, and that’s not to mention the unethical way many of those contracts have been handled breaking regulations.
Coronavirus is hurting the poor, the North and ethnic minorities harder. That’s political, and exacerbated by ten years of Tory rule.
If anything the whole problem lies in that people are ignoring facts for what can be purely seen as "Total bullshit", rather than spout what I have previously in this thread about "idiocy that makes me seem like a fusion of Hawking and Einstein" we can now have a 8pm Thursday "tuting" at the moronic massesmerman wrote: ↑Sun Nov 29, 2020 9:03 amWhere did I “push” my beliefs on anyone? Simply stating facts.
And the fact that Boris is now proposing restrictions end in February to appease Tory rebels shows how little he is following the science. I would be critical of any leader more interested in votes than health.
Users browsing this forum: jdanddiet and 3 guests