What I want to know is: what do you want from the RG forum?
You do have a point there so I'll finish up.
You're always going to get people spouting off about sh!t they know nothing about on internet forums.
People see something they disagree with, and without fully understanding what has led them to believe what they believe will argue hell for leather.
As a university educated retro enthusiast who works for a major news organisation, I was interested to know whether like minded people had come to the same conclusion as me. That is with or without having looked at the evidence, footage, official statements, commentary and political aftermath.
Rather than insult people or bring up irrelevant nonsense about UFOs etc. I thought the members here might get a reasoned debate that might change some minds, there was a bit of that I suppose.
This isn't just some sh!t I "saw on the internet" and thought I'd troll about without fully understanding. When it happened I was glued to the television. The news were reporting multiple explosions before and after the collisions, and then after all the action had died down the government were saying there were no such explosions. I read the 9/11 commission report
, and it didn't answer any of the obvious questions. I read critiques of the report and critiques of the critiques. I even went to ground zero in NYC. Then I started looking at what was else was going on. The US government starts slinging around the threat of "terrorism" as an excuse to do anything they wanted, like invade Afghanistan and Iraq
(it wasn't just WMD
) which they've wanted to do for a while
. The vice president has a financial interest
in the primary beneficiary of the rebuilding contracts that were awarded without bidding.
It comes out that the secretary of defence
changed the NORAD & FAA protocol
months before so that any scrambling of fighter jets had to be approved by him. He was unavailable when it was all going down. The US start locking up people without trial and torturing
people. More recently the CIA are busted editing wikipedia
articles on Iraq.
If you look at any individual thing above it's easy to say, "I'm sure it's just this", or discount it in another way, but when you look at the whole picture it really does actually add up. On the contrary, if you boil it down to only the things you can prove for sure, you still have this entirely suspicious act of apparent magic, 3 steel buildings falling into their own footprint. And don't even get me started about the vaporised titanium 757 engines at the pentagon (that's the official explanation BTW.)
If you can check out all the links in this post (and this one
) and not be suspicious, then I envy you.
The more I see the more I am convinced. I don't believe everything I read, there is a lot is misguided bullsh!t and disinformation out there too. That is not to say that I can't be convinced otherwise. If anyone can give me a scientifically plausible alternative explanation as to how these buildings fell, then by all means bring it on, I'm open.
What the families of the people who died want is a proper, unbiased explanation of the truth
After all, if they were demolished, or at the least if the government knew about it and let it happen, wouldn't you want to know about it?
That's all from me, let's rock.