will2097 wrote:This might be interesting: Muses psycho-profile.
Psychology, apparently, despite its wider public image is in fact a proper science. Individuals studied are, like any other scientific study, categorized. The Police for example are categorizing people in an attempt to stop future crime. If they can identify the next Ian Huntley – well, this can only be a good thing for society.
Psychology isn't a proper science as there are no ways to prove its theories, it also as i have already said fails to interpret people so would be useless in finding future criminals, pychologists aren't phychic, although they like to think they are.
will2097 wrote:
Obviously it is more difficult but when you only have an ‘Internet’ personality, yet the relevance to modern society is critical. My brother actively seeks people like Muse simply as sample or test data, in a wider attempt to gather information and practice his skills. It’s not an exact science – however, accurate within a reasonable margin of error. It’s just a profile. With a pretty wide girth in this case…
oh yes the imaginary psychic brother with the phD, i wondered how long till you were going to bring this out, tell your brother that the bad old muse hunter isn't going to hurt him if he stays under the covers. I think you should be psycho analysing yourself because making people up isn't healthy, and i'm not so sure about your brother either, i'd keep a rape alarm with you incase your imaginary brother imaginary arse buggers you
will2097 wrote:
Apparently – and forgive me if this isn’t entirely technically accurate, I’m repeating this parrot fashion, these are Muses problems.
Basically, Muse is a visual person rather than an audio person. Most of us apparently are. The big pictures of Brad. The focus on visual words and imagery. When he writes, he writes in a visual sense as opposed to audio sense. Muse rarely mentions sounds and sound associated words. Nothing odd so far.
the big pics of brad were even accepted on ntsc-uk when i was a member there, actually maybe your imaginary brother should try analysing your fear of pics of handsome men
will2097 wrote:
Muse most likely lives alone.
It’s possible he suffers from one or all of the visualist psychological impairments. Bad teeth, bad hair, obesity. This maybe the root of his insecurities. Most people don’t care, but when combined with his other inadequacies, they have a negative effect on his psychological composition.
hahahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha, you wish, although that sentence probably would describe 50% of this forum quite accurately
will2097 wrote:
He may well frequent many Internet forums, possibly upwards of 20.
FYI i wish, students don't have the time, neither do i want to spend my time speaking to people i don't feel anything for
will2097 wrote:
Many of his posts are written under the influence of alcohol. That is why he posts so often. Even during the day. Impassioned, irrational and with confused logic. Alcohol impairs logic – Muse cannot see when his posts are simply illogical in the wider sense. He checks them for grammar and accuracy but misses the rational point of his responses. They are marred by irrational ranting – typical of a drunk, with their impaired logic.
Many of his posts fail to miss the topic and show signs of clinical depression. Brought on most likely by the drink. Poor diet and sexual frustration.
Is this another great evaluation of the brilliant imaginary pschologist brother again? i don't know how i can be a alcoholic when i don't drink, thats it i'm drunk in mineral water and the passive smoking of weed
will2097 wrote:
Muse has a good intelligence but most likely an academic failure.
Muse is possibly a chronic introvert – with low self esteem and little inter-personal skills.
Sexually, as above, he is repressed and unsuccessful with members of the opposite sex and most likely a virgin. Other anatomical considerations should be taken into account when combined with his other conditions. (Little Muse might be really little if you follow!)
hahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
just. can't. be. asked. to. reply. hahahahaha
will2097 wrote:
All of which is supported by the sexual nature and content of his posts. Online he over ‘excuses’ this failing by pretending to be Homosexual – but in a none committal way. He suggests but never proves. However, he is hiding behind a classic back-peddle. By claiming to be "Metro-sexual".
In simple terms, Muse wants to pretend to be gay and enjoys the attention that brings him but only when he thinks only men are looking. This would be different if a female was to appear on the scene.
i haven't mentioned i'm gay, i could be, who knows, but that would be no ones buisness if i was. I don't think i ever mentioned i was, so why don't you psycho analyse yourself? there must be issues if you believe all handsome men are gay.
will2097 wrote:
If it were Freudian, he most certainly would fetish over his own mother. Although Freud is largely discredited. (I was asked to add!)
He is not a paedophile. Yet.
Finally – he is almost certainly clinically depressed with a moderate risk of suicide.
just mentioned Freund = therfore talking boll0cks has finally been proved
your imaginary brother is a censored, paedophile? reeeaallyyy, tell him to stop sucking you off and maybe his brains wouldn't be damaged by so much man juice in there.
Issues? maybe check with the person who thinks that internet forums are a form of socialising, is slightly homophobic, hates handsome people, makes up imaginary psychologist brothers and then proceeds to have rough sex with them. Hmmmm........