Retro Shamer vs. Why you should play...

Want to air your opinions on the latest issue of Retro Gamer? Step inside...

Moderators: mknott, NickThorpe, lcarlson, Darran@Retro Gamer, MMohammed

Which one do you prefer?

Why you should play...
Retro Shamer
Total votes: 45

User avatar
Posts: 155
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 1:01 pm
Location: Brugge, Belgium

Retro Shamer vs. Why you should play...

Post by Igorthegreen » Mon Mar 24, 2008 9:20 am

Let's face it: Retro Shamer is fun... But for retrogamers, the comeback of the 'Why you should play...'-item instead would be a much more interesting two-page filler!
Join my '8-BIT KIDS' book Kickstarter at

Posts: 4295
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 11:53 am
Location: in the darkest of dark places!

Post by mohicankid » Mon Mar 24, 2008 9:40 am

i agree...i would rather peeps give me advise on what to play than telling me what not to play!
Just when you thought it was safe to go back in the water...

User avatar
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 6:24 pm
Location: Cambridgeshire

Post by will2097 » Mon Mar 24, 2008 10:26 am

agreed. Watching the RG guys lambast a game is good fun, but better to be told what's good, than not. (if that makes any sense? :shock: )

User avatar
Posts: 20261
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2005 2:25 pm
Location: Planet Sinclair

Post by SirClive » Mon Mar 24, 2008 10:30 am

I like both.

User avatar
Posts: 4198
Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 5:57 am
Location: Just outside the Imperial Capital Of Seaford

Post by djcarlos » Mon Mar 24, 2008 11:02 am

Me too.

User avatar
Posts: 666
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 5:14 am
Location: Torquay, Devon, UK

Post by EnglishRob » Mon Mar 24, 2008 11:13 am

I like both, but I must admit, with limited time on my hands these days it's nice to be given ideas of things to play.

Could it alternate every month?

How much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood? - Guybrush Threepwood

User avatar
Posts: 6439
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 5:14 pm
Location: Skegness, UK

Post by merman » Mon Mar 24, 2008 12:43 pm

[Harry Hill]
There's only one way to find out.... FIGHT!
[/Harry Hill]

Seriously, folks, both articles are fine. And it's nice to have the balance - one writer telling you why you SHOULD play something, one writer saying why you SHOULD NEVER GO NEAR A GAME for fear of lunacy...
merman1974 on Steam, Xbox Live, Twitter and YouTube

Posts: 6833
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 8:24 am

Post by Bub&Bob » Tue Mar 25, 2008 6:52 am

Both are fine by me
The dry fart for Barry MacDermot and all the cancer patients in the Glamorgan testicle ward

User avatar
Posts: 2077
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 7:51 am

Re: Retro Shamer vs. Why you should play...

Post by yethboth » Tue Mar 25, 2008 7:09 am

Igorthegreen wrote:Let's face it: Retro Shamer is fun... But for retrogamers, the comeback of the 'Why you should play...'-item instead would be a much more interesting two-page filler!

I like Retro Shamer the most. :D
My You Tube Channel is:

User avatar
Posts: 276
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 10:36 am
Location: Bournemouth

Post by Stuart@retrogamer » Tue Mar 25, 2008 7:40 am

Essentially, we do kind of cover 'why you should play' through the Classic Game, Eastern Promise and Top 25 articles. This is why the Retro Shamers, we feel, add a little more variety to the mag, because they tell you what not to play.

I doubt we'll remove Retro Shamer. Overall, it seems to be well-liked, and as we're now asking everyone to nominate and vote on the chosen game, we really want to see how this new approach to the feature pans out.

If i'm honest, we'd be more likely to mix-and-match the features each issue - as a few have suggested. But i'm not saying you'll never see Why You Should Plays appearing in the mag again.

User avatar
Posts: 3231
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 7:33 am
Location: The cold wet bit above England...

Post by GarryG » Tue Mar 25, 2008 8:27 am

Why not have both then?

They are both different types of article, cant see why it should be one or the other!?
Why not visit my ramblings at Garry's Gaming Blog

Posts: 1214
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 9:57 am

Post by mikeb » Tue Mar 25, 2008 8:34 am

It's a bit daft to directly compare them anyway, the WYMP articles are 4 page plus in-depth features, the Retro Shamers are light-hearted 2 pagers.

I do miss the WYMP's though.

User avatar
Posts: 8809
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 3:29 am
Location: Northampton, UK

Post by » Tue Mar 25, 2008 9:21 am

Personally, I like both articles.
However I've really started enjoying the Retro Shamer articles, it brings a massive smile to my face, which then turns into laughter after I realise how poop the game that is featured really is.

User avatar
Posts: 214
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2008 10:15 am
Location: North Norway

Post by Technomancer » Tue Mar 25, 2008 2:39 pm

I like both, but since I have to pick one, it'll have to be "Why you should play...".

User avatar
Posts: 597
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 11:28 am
Location: Cork, Ireland

Post by Cornelius » Tue Mar 25, 2008 8:55 pm

Do you know what I can see happening? Same games appearing in both features. Or at least different versions of the same game.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests