Got to say though that I'm a bit reluctant to leave any feedback in case the writer of the articles come at me with threats like in this one
Is this the new editorial policy? Threaten any readers who don't share the 'correct' opinion? Maybe all posts should be vetted by this guy to ensure that only high praise for every written word is posted on here. Or perhaps the people on the tills at WH Smiths should interview buyers to make sure they are worthy to read your magazine?Rev. Stuart Campbell wrote:
If you don't find them interesting, that's fair enough, though you seem to be in a minority. But if you're going to call the Definitive features "lazy", when in fact they're each about 10 times as much work as I've ever done on any other article in my life, then you're looking to get your lights punched out, laddie. I nearly bloody killed myself getting to the bottom of Bubble Bobble, so call it boring, call it rubbish, call it anything you like except "lazy" if you like your teeth where they currently are.
Well, like I said, another terrific issue. Thank you very very very much for letting me read it, and please thank all your writers for every wonderful word they slaved over - we, the humble readers, are forever in your debt. If my opinions are wrong, please don't hit me. I'll try harder next month.