Retro Gamer forum

Mario articles, yawn. At least no "free" gift that's completely unwanted this issue. Well done for showing restraint

Another crappy gift I didn't want, another pound I had to pay to read an increasingly threadbare magazine. And more paid for advertising booklets. 100 issues ago things were a lot better

I'm not subbing because your subscriptions department is awful. one look at the topic shows me many angry subscribers. Yeah, slate me for complaining about paying an extra quid. Idiotic. I don't want their tat, it certainly isn't worth a pound, and I'm sure they are making an extra 90p off me.. why ...

Shao khan because he's a great antagonist. "It's official, you suck".

Yeah no surprise the sheep on here just love paying an extra quid for a CD they admit they don't even play. You literally can't make this stuff up. No opinion about the lower quality paper and how the mag is a shadow of its former self. Note to rg/future - stop preying on your customers. It's five q...

Hi. It's very cynical of you to put unwanted tat on the front of your magazine, and then charge me an extra quid for it. I put up with you guys massively lowering the quality of the paper inside, but this is just abusing loyal customers.

No more paid for free gifts, thanks.

No mention of q2 multiplayer? It was huge in the UK. We were also arguably the best at it. A series on online gaming would be nice - gamespy 3d, wireplay, even won.net or heat... Need a time bandit feature- using the atari st graphics of course Good issue, cheap paper always disheartening to see tho...

What's with the nintendo shilling this ish? It was ok during the snes mini due to the super play ish, but 100% to mario odyssey and then a gushing advertorial piece about samus returns? The cheapo paper is disappointing too, will you ever go back to something better? The added content is nice i supp...